The founding editorial corpus. Argued positions, documented sources and analytical frameworks that boards can mobilise in their own oversight work.
How the Caremark standard — until now reserved to financial and compliance risk — becomes a fiduciary test for AI oversight. And why European boards should care, despite Caremark's US origin.
The diagnostic every chair should run before the next board meeting. Seven short questions, seven possible answers, a score that reveals real organizational maturity.
Audit treats AI as a risk. The board must treat it as a cognitive mutation. The confusion explains 80% of current dysfunctions.
Executives master the models. The board receives the outputs. Translation has become the central political ground of the boardroom.
The EU AI Act mandates "AI literacy". The debate is at the wrong level: what boards need is the art of questioning, not the art of coding.
Agentic AI breaks the traditional contract of human signature. Boards must rethink the power of decision before agents take it.
Three reference frames coexist. None is sufficient in isolation. An honest comparison and a selection grid for European boards.
AI pushes boards toward premature convergence. The role of the chair is redefined: provoking the disagreement decisions require.
The translator, the ethicist, the operator, the researcher. How to balance the cognitive layer of a board without sliding into tech tokenism.
The corpus is being published progressively. To be notified of new pieces, contact us via the form.